I find interesting that even though the article was written in 1964, yet it feels very current. The technology is far more advanced now, but I don’t think the art world in this matter has had the development that should have. Even though there are artists today who use technology this field is still in development. Not because of a lack of resources but rather for the lack of interest or knowledge, which are necessary, in order to develop this kind of projects. The other thing that comes to my mind is that nowadays you still have to do your research to find art projects that involve technology. I don’t know why they aren’t shown in the mainstream media. You are lucky if you find maybe 20%, of an art exhibition, that could be categorized as art and technology in comparison to painting or sculpture.